You’ve Got To Be Kidding Me…..

I found out in the news recently that a British supermodel is having an abortion to improve her chances of appearing on a reality TV show. Yep. You heard it right. The 23-year old model and call girl Josie Cunningham is 18 weeks pregnant with her 8th child. She is mother to two boys and has lost an additional five babies through miscarriages. The newest baby’s dad is either a British Premier League soccer player or a former client. Both potential fathers have offered to pay child support if she gives birth, but she turned both offers down. So one of the men is now offering to pay for the abortion at an undisclosed location in London.

Ms. Cunningham is doing this in an attempt to join the cast of the British TV show Big Brother. She said, “Channel 5 were keen to shortlist me then they found out I was pregnant. Then they suddenly turned cold. That was when I started considering an abortion. After the operation I will be going back to them and asking if they will still consider me. I’ve also had loads of other offers to further my career – and I’m not willing to give them up because I’m pregnant.” Cunningham has already become infamous in England for exploiting the National Health Service insurance program to pay for breast implants and cosmetic dentistry.

Channel 5, the TV network that hosts Big Brother, has already made it clear they are turning Cunningham down whether she has the abortion or not. And English abortion law states that a woman cannot have an abortion in her second trimester of pregnancy unless there is a severe risk to the mother’s life or health, or if there’s a chance that the baby would be seriously handicapped. Cunningham has been trying to increase her chances of harming the baby by drinking and smoking throughout her pregnancy.

Hopefully, all of us across the political spectrum can agree that her reason for doing this is sick and twisted. Pro-choice people and pro-life people alike try to be compassionate and understanding when a woman is pregnant and facing a difficult situation, such as poverty or rape or incest. We can all agree there that the woman is not wantonly ending her child’s life, but that the decision she faces over what to do next is a difficult one. We just disagree on what the solution is to the woman’s dilemma.

But this is mind-boggling. In the interview where Cunningham gave her reason for doing what she’s doing, she was rubbing her belly while smoking a cigarette. That mental picture in and of itself is the most diabolical thing I have ever imagined. When expectant mothers rub their baby bumps, it’s typically done out of love and tenderness for the babies in their wombs. And now that image has been perverted by a woman who’s deliberately and desperately wanting to harm her unborn child because she sees the baby as an obstacle to her own 15 minutes of fame.

I don’t know how anyone could be kind to Josie in this situation. When I was growing up, I was always told it’s easier to attract flies with sugar instead of vinegar. But I don’t know how to do that here. You could try to appeal to the fact that her popularity has dropped dramatically in Britain and in the United States, thus lessening her chances that she’ll be hired to do anything by another TV program.

But, she’s already made it clear that she doesn’t care about that.  And she seems convinced that she’ll still make it as a TV star. Because of this, there’s no point in asking her what would happen if every media outlet in England rejected her and left her alone to confront her decision of ending her child’s life.

She’s already appealed to her sons to justify her decision, saying that she’ll be a better mother to them if she has the abortion. So there’s no point in anyone asking her how she would tell those boys what happened should they ever find out that they lost a sibling due to their mother’s selfishness.

I just don’t know how you could get through to someone who’s that cold-hearted and selfish. Or how you respond to such narcissism and cruelty without exploding in a fit of rage. Right now I’m just glad I’m not able to speak to Josie directly about this, because I don’t know how I would react.

So here I am writing this blog post, and I’m shocked, stumped, and saddened. I’m shocked that that someone is willing to kill someone else just to get her own way, stumped about what to do or say next, and saddened that a human being would treat her own child with such disregard, and then publicize this information like it’s the greatest thing she’s ever done. To their credit, tons of people in England are infuriated with this woman now, and I’m glad to hear that. But otherwise, I’m speechless. It’s sickening to see people stoop so low.

Allergy Season

Dear Spring Time,

Why do you make it so hard for me to love you? Don’t get me wrong, you’re beautiful and I want to be your friend. In fact, I am quite jealous of the people who get to enjoy your company. I envy those who get to walk around their neighborhoods and have picnics and go on hikes your time of the year. I envy those who can stop to admire flowers growing by a neighbor’s mailbox. I even envy people who can do yard work without sneezing because I am not able to do that myself. And I love seeing the trees and flowers blossom, with all their bright purple and yellow and white petals.

But there are a lot of people in this world with whom you don’t get along very well, and I am one of them. I think you might hate us or something, even though we never did anything to you. Because I feel your wrath every FRICKIN’ year, and I don’t know why you treat me and so many others so horrendously. Or why you would even want to, for that matter. Maybe you’re just sadistic, since you don’t seem ready to quit making people’s lives miserable any time soon. And if that’s the case, maybe I am a masochist for even wanting to befriend you in the first place.

You see, in order for you to be so lovely and creative, you have to produce this stuff called pollen. And pollen makes me itch and sneeze like nothing doing. Because of it, I don’t get spring fever. I get spring hay fever instead. And I can’t seem to cure it or avoid it no matter what I do. It’s an unholy trinity of sneezing, an itchy nose, and itchy eyes. Maybe this is a foreshadowing of hell; or maybe it’s Purgatory on Earth. Because it’s not heavenly, that’s for sure! There’s no way I want to join the angels in singing God’s praises over this stuff. Some people might, but it’s not my thing. Gerard Manley Hopkins and Emily Dickinson can have their fun doing that as long as they leave me out of it.

Every March through May, my entire world becomes a torture chamber. If it gets cold at my house, I can’t go outside because I’ll be sneezing once or twice every minute. Even if I am inside, the least bit of dust anywhere adds to my problems. Come to think of it, if sneezes and nose-blowings were musical notes, I could probably write a symphony every year, and have a lifetime output rivaling that of Mozart or Beethoven.

My nose oozes snot like a leaky faucet periodically throughout the day, my nostrils becoming slime factories. I can’t keep my purse organized, because everything is buried under a pile of tissues. I have to wear glasses instead of contacts for several weeks, because it feels like SOMEONE lit my eyes on fire with a blowtorch (*HINT, HINT*), and it’s very tempting to claw them out. It’s like Dante’s Inferno in my eyeballs, except there’s no frozen hostile wasteland. I can’t even escape your presence through sleep, because I wake up every morning looking like I have pink-eye, with my eyes nearly swollen shut, and my eyelids crusted together with dried up gunk. Chances are I probably had some sneezing fits during the night too.

You sure are a slob, because you strew this pollen garbage around pretty well, and you won’t clean up after yourself. You just wait for people or the rain to do it for you. And when the rain does come, it just gives you fuel to create more pollen; so it’s a never-ending cycle, like Nietzche’s Eternal Return. Or, to put it another way, it’s almost like when Mount Vesuvius erupted in ancient Italy, except it’s not quite as deadly and it’s in yellow. It’s all over everyone’s cars. It’s on the sidewalk and the street. It’s on my driveway. There’s no getting away from it. I bet you like color coordination because it’s the same hue of the substance that seeps from my nose and eyes.

I’ve tried several times to let go of my resistance to you. It just doesn’t seem to work out for some reason. Every year, during the last 5-6 weeks of winter, I take bee pollen tablets. The whole idea behind this is for me to let some of this pollen into my system, so that I won’t be suffering quite as bad once you come to visit. But there’s still something about you that rubs me the wrong way when you arrive in full force. I’m not sure what it is, but it makes my life a living nightmare. It gets to the point where I have to medicate myself with Allegra or Claritin or Zyrtec and eye drops, because I need them to help numb the pain you inflict. Sometimes those things can’t even help me! And I sure look forward to seeing you leave every time, because you are the bane of my existence for a quarter of every year.

When I was growing up in New York, things were different. You are much milder up there then you are here in Tennessee. It’s because the climate is much cooler. In fact, I still remember going over to my grandpa’s house each spring when he would have his annual garage sale, and it would often be in the 50s when he set everything up in the morning. I would sell lemonade and soda on those days, and every year I wouldn’t get any customers for the first few hours because it was too cold for soft drinks. There were many springs where it was still snowing. And even if it wasn’t snowing, it wouldn’t be 80+ degrees in April. It would be in the low 70s at the most. So when things started blossoming, it would happen much more gradually instead of all at once. The only time I miss living in New York is when you come around, and I would be more than happy to shovel snow in April and March if it meant that you were almost non-existent.

Of course, it’s physically impossible to get away from you. You stay away for about nine months of the year (thank you for that, by the way), but then you make your annual visit for three months, and I can’t stop you from coming. I can’t make you go away either. I can’t impose a restraining order on you. I can’t start up an anti-bullying campaign or a picket line against allergy season or anything like that. I can protest by myself until my face turns blue and I pass out, but that won’t change a thing. There’s literally nothing I can do to avoid you. I just have to put up with you.

Here’s to hoping that we can be on better terms with each other in the future. I wish we could be friends, and I understand that it’s necessary that you have to make your annual appearance. There are four seasons every year. We can’t go from winter straight to summer. There needs to be some kind of a transitional period in between so things don’t go from cold weather to hot weather all at once. That’s not good for the plants or the environment. And there needs to be some time allowed for the trees and flowers to bloom. I just wish everything wasn’t so painful, that’s all.

So would you quit being so harsh and mean to me and my fellow allergy-sufferers? I’m begging you, for the sake of our sanity and the sake of our health. Help me so I can sleep at night. Help me so I don’t have to hear people sniffle constantly. Help me so I can breathe a little easier. But more than anything, I just want to enjoy your company, and you’re not letting me do that. I want to get to know you better; honestly I do. I know my pleas will likely be futile, but I really hope they’re not. So I’m keeping my fingers crossed that you’ll take me up on my offer.

                                                                         Sincerely,

                                                                         Briana

The Saint Who Almost Never Was

In 1920s Europe, Emilia Kaczorowska was expecting her third child. She experienced complications during this pregnancy from rheumatic fever, which affected her heart. This left her health in a very delicate state. “You need to have an abortion,” her doctor Jan Moskala said, “in order to save your life.” But the devoutly Catholic Emilia refused to do so. She had a baby boy on May 18, 1920, and would live for another 9 years before she died. Her son would live for nearly 85 years. He would become Pope John Paul II. He’ll be canonized in Rome this April 27th, along with Pope John XXIII.

What would the world have missed out on if this man wasn’t allowed to live?

This moment in 1978 wouldn’t have happened: It’s two and a half weeks after Pope John Paul I died of a heart attack. The Cardinals are at the Vatican having a conclave to elect a new pope. The two leading candidates for the papacy are Italian: The conservative Archbishop Giuseppe Siri and the liberal Giovanni Benelli. The College of Cardinals can’t seem to break the tie between the two men. On the second day of the conclave, Austrian Archbishop Franz Konig suggests Karol Wojtyla as a compromise. Wojtyla is elected, and becomes the first non-Italian pope in 456 years. This blazes a trail for his next two successors: Pope Benedict XVI of Germany, and Pope Francis I of Argentina.

How about this: In the year 2000, 17 year old Australian Matt Fradd went to World Youth Day in Rome. He’d been raised in a Catholic family, but had become more or less an atheist after grappling with questions about life and its meaning and not understanding the Church’s stance on those issues. Fradd tells people, “I called myself either an agnostic or an atheist depending on my digestion any given day.” He had stopped attending Mass as a teenager, but his mother came home from church one Sunday in the year 2000 and told him that their family’s parish was taking people to World Youth Day. Matt initially saw it as a chance to explore Italy and meet girls, but he reverted back to Catholicism while he was there. He said, “I was surrounded by young Catholics who were very knowledgeable about their faith, and I never experienced anything like that before. So many of the philosophical questions I had about life were answered. Why have people from time immemorial believed there’s an omnipotent, omniscient higher power? Because such a being actually exists, and it’s God. Why do there seem to be universal moral laws governing the universe? Because there’s a God who is the moral law-giver.”

Since then, Matt has become an internationally known Catholic apologist, author and speaker. He has spoken to thousands of teenagers and adults about what the Church teaches and why. He spent time working with NET Ministries, which sends missionaries around the world to spread the Gospel to young people. He has also worked with the Catholic Answers radio program in San Diego. He lives in Georgia with his wife Cameron and their three kids.

Who knows how Matt’s life would have turned out if Pope John Paul II wasn’t around to invent World Youth Day. Would he still be an atheist or agnostic? Would he be married to Cameron, whom he met through NET Ministries? Would he have spent so much of his life teaching people about Catholicism?

Or consider this: During JPII’s reign, the Holy Father visited many English-speaking countries. And when he attended Mass in these countries, he noticed that their translations of the Liturgy and of the Missal were incoherent. They varied from nation to nation, and some of these were badly done. So, in the year 2000, the first order to reform the Liturgy came from Pope John Paul II. And the new Mass translation made its debut in November 2011.

The list goes on. Would Communism have collapsed in Eastern Europe? If so, how much longer would it have taken? Would the Church have begun taking greater strides to create understanding between Catholics, Protestant and Orthodox Christians, and people of other religions? Would the New Evangelization have begun? Would the Church have renewed its efforts to vocalize its fight against the “culture of death,” (a term the late pontiff coined)? We can only speculate.

All these wonderful things, and countless others, happened simply because this future saint’s mother allowed her little boy to live instead of aborting him. Some people might say that abortion is a way to weed out the Osama Bin Ladens and Unabombers of this world before they can wreak havoc on humanity. But no one knows how people’s lives will turn out before they’re born. And it takes a certain amount of hatred and self-loathing to see every person and one’s self as a potential terrorist instead of seeing them as beings worthy of unconditional love, and people who could become the next Mother Teresa or the next Pope John Paul II.

The first step towards anyone becoming a saint, just like that Polish baby boy Karol Wojtyla, is being born into this world. The path to sainthood is never easy, requiring tremendous selflessness and a willingness to cooperate with God’s grace to fulfill the great plans He has for us. But one of the greatest tragedies of contemporary life is that this opportunity to walk down the path to holiness is deliberately closed off to millions of unborn children around the world every day.

Millions of voices today we hear today are okay with denying the next Saint Peter or Ignatius of Loyola the chance to experience the gift of life and to use that gift to glorify God. And we should all thank God that Emilia Kaczorowska refused to listen to one of those voices. Countless souls have been touched either directly or indirectly because she gave birth to her son, and it truly is a gift that he will be canonized in the coming weeks.

But, to fully honor the memory of this extraordinary man, we must do two more things: we must protect all human life from the point of conception to the point of natural death. All of us have the potential to become saints. Therefore, all of us should be protected from premature death to fully take advantage of the chance to live out that calling.

Secondly, we should all recognize our own lives as gifts, and as tremendous opportunities to one day join the communion of saints in heaven. The late pontiff would want us to do so. In his address to World Youth Day attendees in 2002, he said, “Just as salt gives flavor to food and light illumines the darkness, so too holiness gives full meaning to life and makes it reflect God’s glory. How many saints, especially young saints, can we count in the Church’s history! In their love for God their heroic virtues shone before the world, and so they became models of life which the Church has held up for imitation by all….Through the intercession of this great host of witnesses, may God make you too, dear young people, the saints of the third millennium!”

Pope John Paul the Great is one saint who almost never was, since he narrowly escaped death before he was born. All of us run the risk of becoming saints who never were through our choosing to say no to God and the graces he wishes to lavish upon us, and by failing to recognize what a gift our own lives are. For Saint Karol Wojtyla’s sake, may that not be said of us.

Of Colorblindness and Clarity

In spring 2009, the second semester of my freshman year at Belmont University, I took two memorable classes: A black literature course and a civil rights history course, taught by Drs. David Curtis and Peter Kuryla, respectively. These were my Linked Cohort classes, so named because they consisted of two separate fields of study linked together, and complemented each other. A few months earlier, I was in my advisor’s office, and she was looking at ClassFinder on her computer to help me decide which set of these required general education courses I would be taking. She came across that pair, they fit into my schedule, and I was excited because I enjoy looking at the overlap between literature and history.

On the first day of Dr. Kuryla’s class, he asked each of us why we registered for this particular set of classes, and that was my answer. I said, “I like literature and I like history, so I’m excited to study both of them at once.” Another student said he was taking these classes because he’d come from a small, predominately white town, and was looking at the struggles African-Americans had endured through the years. In my mind, I dismissed his answer as a load of politically correct baloney. Little did I know that I would be doing the exact same thing as him over the next four months.

Before I took these classes, I struggled to understand racism’s relevance to today. Two months before the semester began, Barack Obama had become the first African-American President of the United States, and people across the country were excited about his achievement. The day after Obama’s inauguration, I was in Dr. Kuryla’s class, and we discussed the election. I started the conversation with a question. I asked “If race is no longer an issue deciding who gets to be President, why are we discussing Obama’s skin color?”

The whole class critiqued my remarks. Most of my peers’ replies have faded from memory, but one answer has remained with me even now. Jessica Anderson and Kierra Norman were two black girls who took these classes with me. They were the first to speak up and said, “You’re white. You don’t have to think about your skin color and the way it affects you like we have to.” And with those two sentences, everything I thought I knew about racism shattered before me like a crystal wine glass crashing to a hardwood floor.

As I was growing up, neither I nor my family was overtly racist or mean-spirited against non-white folk. We weren’t Neo-Nazis or involved with the KKK or waving Confederate flags. My mom and dad grew up listening to Motown artists such as Diana Ross and Donna Summer, and they watched TV shows with multi-ethnic casts such as The Jeffersons. I had done likewise, except that the pop culture figures and programs of my generation were different. Some of my favorite TV shows when I was a child were My Brother and Me, Kenan and Kel, Cousin Skeeter and All That. My siblings and I listened to popular musicians and bands such as Boyz II Men, TLC, and Destiny’s Child. And my family’s favorite baseball team was the New York Yankees, whose roster had men from all sorts of different racial backgrounds. All of us loved watching Derek Jeter, Cecil Fielder, and Tino Martinez make magic happen on the baseball diamond.

And yet, in our personal lives, we didn’t interact with people of color very often. We lived in a mostly white neighborhood, attended a predominately white church, and my siblings and I went to schools where almost all the students were white. Looking back, I don’t think we necessarily hated people who were different from us. We just didn’t get to know them as well as we should have.

Because of this, I heard all sorts of racial stereotypes, and I eventually started believing they were true. It was all I’d ever heard, and I never really understood how often I was labeling people I hadn’t gotten to know. People of Middle Eastern descent were described as “towel heads.” Once 9/11 happened, they became terrorists. All Asian people (aka “Chinese people”) did kung fu and worked in laundromats and talked like the Chinese restaurant owners from the movie A Christmas Story. All black people knew how to dance. If I was somewhere where there were few white people, I was uncomfortable because I was the minority. In church, I had been taught the Golden Rule. Yet somehow it didn’t occur to me that part of loving my neighbor as myself involved not labeling people who were different from me, because I would hate it if someone had done that to me.

As I grew older, I had a vague notion that I was holding onto pre-conceived ideas and fears about people of color. By the time I graduated from high school, I’d had several classmates who weren’t white, and I counted a few of them among my friends. I also had a few teachers who weren’t white. But I still wasn’t aware of the problems they faced because of their skin color, and I still hadn’t let go of some of the stereotypes that had been passed along to me. Instead, I unwittingly absorbed those stereotypes, and carried that mentality with me for years.

So when Jessica and Kierra spoke to me during that class discussion, it was eye-opening and disconcerting. I headed out of class that day knowing that I had been licked in that conversation.  I also knew I would have to relearn everything I had been taught about racism over the years, and I was resistant to that process at first.

As the semester progressed, I was immersed into a view of America that was very different from the one I knew. It wasn’t the land of the free or the home of the brave that I’d been taught about ever since I was young. This America was struggling to become that type of country. We learned about the stereotypes of blacks that had been perpetuated since the Civil War era. We learned about black minstrel shows. We had an in-depth conversation about the debate between W.E.B. DuBois and Booker T. Washington over black education. We read works by Frederick Douglass, James Baldwin, Toni Morrison, Claude McKay, Langston Hughes, and Lorraine Hansberry, among others. We read James Weldon Johnson’s Autobiography of an Ex-Colored Man and discussed the struggle bi-racial people had in forming their identities. We wrote analytical papers about the Dred Scott and Plessy V. Ferguson Supreme Court decisions. We discussed lynching. We talked about the formation of the Ku Klux Klan as a social, political, and semi-religious institution. We learned about Malcolm X, Stokely Carmichael, Angela Davis, and the Student Non-Violent Coordinating Committee. We talked about the Nation of Islam. We learned about the Black Panthers and Huey Newton’s arrest. I watched my first Spike Lee movie ever. And with each lesson, Drs. Curtis and Kuryla would connect what we were studying to racial problems America was facing today. That bothered me because it felt like both of them were fixated on racism, and I wondered why they just wouldn’t get over it.

In my previous history and literature classes, I looked at America from a predominately white perspective. I didn’t know much about black history except a little about slavery, a little bit about Jim Crow, and a little about the Civil Rights Movement and Martin Luther King. I had even less knowledge of black literature. I had read poems from Paul Lawrence Dunbar, selections from Oludah Equiano’s narrative of his captivity and enslavement, Toni Morrison’s Beloved, Ralph Ellison’s Invisible Man, Lorraine Hansberry’s A Raisin in the Sun, and Richard Wright’s autobiography Black Boy, and that was pretty much it. But either way, I thought it was great that America had come so far in overcoming racial discrimination, and I thought we should celebrate those accomplishments more than we did. It felt like I was being sent on a huge white guilt trip and I didn’t want to go along for the ride. And yet, Jessica’s and Kierra’s words continually echoed in my mind.

Towards the end of the semester in Dr. Curtis’s class, we watched Spike Lee’s movie Bamboozled. Damon Wayans plays Pierre De La Croix, a TV network scriptwriter who pitches an idea for a black minstrel variety show when his proposal for a Cosby Show-esque sitcom is rejected. Mantan: The New Millennium Minstrel Show, takes place in a watermelon patch and the actors are African-Americans performing in blackface. Savion Glover and Tommy Davidson are two impoverished street performers who agree to be cast as the show’s main characters to earn money. Savion Glover is Mantan and Tommy Davidson plays his sidekick, Sleep n’ Eat. Racial slurs and jokes about slavery and fried chicken and Alabama porch monkeys and incest are tossed around like seeds scattered in soil. Aunt Jemima, Little Nigger Jim, and Sambo are among the show’s characters. And the show becomes a hit.

As I watched this brutally offensive film, the whole semester flashed before my eyes. Every stereotype I’d heard as I was growing up, along with all the ones I had learned about during the previous 4 months, was right in front of me. It was overwhelming to see so much hatred at once, and I knew at that point that there was no turning back. I would never think about racism the same way as I had before.

That semester gave me so much to think about with regards to racism in America, and how I relate to people of color. In the following years, I had more revelatory experiences with learning about this issue in my classes. In spring 2010, I took an American history course that covered the period from Reconstruction through the Vietnam War. The professor, Debi Back, was Native American. We went over some of the same things I was taught in Dr. Curtis’s and Kuryla’s classes. We also learned about the Latin American Civil Rights movement in the 1950s and 60s, and the American Indian Movement in the 1970s, which I never even knew existed until she brought it up. She had us read the autobiography of Mary Crow Dog, a leader in the American Indian Movement.

That fall, I took a folklore studies course with Dr. Cynthia Cox in the English department. We spent about half the semester learning about Native American folklore, since Dr. Cox has worked as an oral historian on the Pine Ridge Reservation in South Dakota. She had us read the book Neither Wolf Nor Dog, where the white author Kent Nerburn chronicles his experience of helping a Native American elder share his insights into the culture clash between Native Americans and non-natives. That was another edifying time for me.

Having these experiences hasn’t made me an expert on racism, or anything near it. And I will probably never stop learning. But when an engineer builds a bridge, he must first measure the gap between point A and point B. I’ve been given knowledge of how far the abyss between racial injustice and racial equity spreads, and surely that counts for something. At the same time, being anti-racist has to be more than an intellectual exercise for me. Alain Locke and Martin Luther King and all the other anti-racist activists and unknown folk for whom they advocated were flesh and blood people, and not just characters out of a history book. Today, millions of flesh and blood people around me are treated unjustly because of their skin color. So this new attitude my education has given me has to translate into how I interact with others. But this is where things get messy.

Since I’ve spent time looking at America from the angles of people whose racial backgrounds are different from mine, I’m more hesitant to accuse others of playing the race card when they feel the need to talk about race. When racial jokes are told and racial stereotypes are thrown around among people I know, it’s been easier for me to recognize these things as derogatory and speak out against them. But sometimes it gets frustrating to do that, since the people I talk to about these things have deeply ingrained prejudices, and I feel like a broken record telling people over and over again to let go of their bigotry. At the same time, I used to have that problem. I can see myself in these people, and I know firsthand it takes a while to unlearn mistaken things one has been taught. If I had more patience, it would be much easier to handle situations like this.

It also doesn’t help that I’ve been very shy and introverted my whole life. Saint Paul had his thorn in the flesh that plagued him every day. I have a tongue that gets tied pretty easily when I’m around other people and hinders me from communicating as effectively as I want to. I’m not using this problem as an excuse for not speaking out when I should, but it’s painful to deal with it when my voice can be a powerful tool for social change. Edmund Burke once wrote that “The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.” I don’t want to do nothing when people are treated unfairly. In any case, this has been the extent of my anti-racist activism. If I knew of other ways to get involved in this cause, I would do it in a heartbeat. I just need guidance to know what to do next.

My relationship with Jessica and Kierra was very casual. We’d see each other outside of class occasionally. Kierra lived in the same dorm building as me during our freshman year, so I ran into her every once in a while. And I’d see them both around campus sometimes in the years to follow. But we’d gone our separate ways once the spring 2009 semester was over. I never had them in another class again.

A lot has happened since then. In 2013, I shared this story as a submission for a contest at Belmont. The contest was a part of the school’s annual Humanities Symposium, a collaborative effort amongst the school’s departments of English, Philosophy, and Foreign Languages. Each year, they would choose a theme related to the humanities and host a week long program of guest lectures and workshops centered on that theme. As a part of the Symposium, the English department held its annual student composition contest, where students could send in essays, poetry, and short stories related to the Symposium’s theme. Winners had the opportunity to share their work during the week of the Symposium. The theme for that year was Encountering the Other, and I instantly thought of the semester I had spent with Jessica and Kierra. When I finished writing my essay, I was able to reach out to Kierra via Facebook and send it to her. She read it, and we had a brief but meaningful chat afterwards about how much her words to had meant to me over the years. Even though I lost the contest, I counted that as a win.

In the years to follow, many racially charged incidents happened around the country. In 2014, Tamir Rice was gunned down by police for the crime of playing with a BB gun. The following year, Dylann Roof killed nine black people having a Bible study at their church. In 2020, the country was reeling from the aftermath of the death of George Floyd, a black man from Minneapolis who was suffocated to death by white police officer Derek Chauvin, who suffocated him to death by placing his knee on his neck for nine minutes straight. People’s anger and grief manifested itself in nationwide protests, rioting, and cries for justice. The president’s response was to unleash the National Guard in cities across the country, tweeting “When they start looting, we start shooting,” as he sat safely tucked away in the White House basement.  Statues of seemingly every person with even a slightly racist background in our country’s history were pulled down left and right. My own high school alma mater was embroiled in its own controversy upon the revelation that our school’s namesake was a Confederate sympathizer during the Civil War. On our alumni Facebook page, former students of color shared anecdotes of racism they experienced while enrolled there and asked for the school to change its name.

In the midst of all of this, I still haven’t been able to contact Jessica. I’ve tried reaching out to her on Facebook and Twitter with no luck at all. But I also can’t blame her if she never wants to speak to me again. Every time I interacted with her, she was kind and friendly. And I failed to return the favor. I wasn’t rude, but I shied away from her. Perhaps this was because I’ve struggled with shyness for as long as I can remember. Or maybe it was partly because I was taking a long hard look at the unexamined labels and prejudices I had built up against non-white folk over the years and was struggling to overcome those problems since they were so deep-seated. But either way, I squandered the gift of getting to know her. And it’s too late for me to do anything about it. She graduated from Belmont ahead of me, I don’t know what she’s doing with her life now, and it very well could be awkward for her to receive a Facebook friend request from me after I’ve clammed up around her so much.

And yet, I can take something away from the short time I knew her. If I could say anything to Jessica now, I’d let her know how much her words have meant to me. All these years later, they still echo within me. When I see news stories of men like George Floyd getting brutally killed by a police officer; or people like Dylan Roof shooting up a black church out of sheer bigotry; or Breonna Taylor dying because of a senseless no-knock warrant; in my mind’s eye I can imagine Jessica speaking to me as she did during that class discussion. I wonder if I’ve lost my chance to talk to her ever again. If I could, hopefully it would be meaningful for her to hear what I have to say. It would be cathartic for me to let her know it. “You’re white,” she told me when I asked why Americans couldn’t be colorblind towards each other in this day and age. “You don’t have to think about your skin color and the way it affects you like I have to.” Thanks to her and Kierra, I’ve been forced to think about it. It’s been impossible for me to look back.

Shattered Silence

Benjamin Franklin wrote this about the virtue of silence: “Speak not but what may benefit yourself or others. Avoid trifling conversation.” This adage more or less sums up my personality, both for the better and for the worse. I have been a woman of few words for as long as I can remember, so much so that I was held back in pre-school because I never talked to my classmates or my teachers. According to my dad’s sister, who still lives in my hometown of Binghamton, New York, my earliest schoolteachers still remember me because I was so quiet and shy. I find it interesting that I’ve left a mark on people’s lives by doing nothing at all. Most remarkable people have at least left a few memorable quotations in their wake. I suppose I am a special case, because I cannot say the same about myself.

My taciturn ways have given me difficulties over the years. It has always been hard for me to build and maintain friendships. When I was a kid, I preferred to keep to myself, often reading rather than playing with my peers. As middle school and high school came and went, things didn’t change much. I wasn’t hated, but I wasn’t popular, either. Everyone else would trade inside jokes with their friends, would have their own special group of people that they hung out with, would almost constantly see each other outside of school, always chose each other for kickball teams and other games while I was the last one called, etc.

My friends through those years were anyone who would talk to me. I will never forget how I met one of my closest friends to this day, Maria Nicholson. It was my sophomore year of high school. I had a few classes with her best friend Jenny. Before the first bell rang each school morning, she and Jenny would sit along the edge of the hallway and chatter about who knows what to pass time. Both of them would often say hi to me as I walked by. I didn’t remember meeting Maria before, but politely said hello anyways. One morning when she greeted me I worked up the nerve to ask her where she knew me from. She chuckled and replied, “We don’t know each other. Jenny’s told me about you. My name’s Maria by the way.” I said “It’s nice to meet you Maria. I hope Jenny has been saying nice things about me.” She giggled again, assured me that she had heard good things about me, and we’ve been friends ever since.

Maria and other people who befriended me during those years couldn’t relate to how painful it was to freeze up during a social situation; to have more awkward silences than words spoken in a typical conversation with someone else, as if the other person had fired a tranquilizer dart directly at my vocal chords the moment they opened their mouth to talk to me; to want to get to know other people so badly, but to be too insecure and hesitant to initiate friendships. But Maria and others like her accepted me and reached out to me, and for that I will always be thankful. I don’t know how I would’ve made it through school without them.

I still have some regrets leftover from this period in my life. A few years ago, my freshman year of college, I went to my high school’s Homecoming football game. A lot of old classmates were home on their Fall Breaks. I ran into them during halftime. They were there palling around with their old buddies, just as they always had. They courteously said hello to me, asking me how I was doing, but I could sense the huge difference in the way they interacted with each other versus how they interacted with me. They were just comfortable with each other, almost as family members were. Upon seeing this it dawned on me that I had blown so many opportunities to just take an interest in other people’s lives, or make any small step towards overcoming my shyness.

Around middle school, my teachers pointed out to me that I had a knack for writing. My eighth grade teacher, Mr. Langley, was especially an inspiration to me. He had a love for literature and the arts, and could sense that same love in me. He said my writing ability was a gift to be cherished, polished, and used often. Up until I met him, I never knew how deep my love for the written word was. I had been a bookworm since I learned how to read, but this was a turning point for me. From then until now, writing was and still is my primary form of self-expression.

When I write, it is the only time I feel that I can be 100 percent myself. If, when I am writing, I cannot figure out how to share my thoughts, there are no social consequences for my failures. It is equally frustrating, but at least I know I will not be rejected or stared at like an insect for having writer’s block; whereas if I am with others and words escape me, I stand out like a sore thumb. When I write, I don’t have to worry about what others think of me. I don’t have to hold any thing back. If, when I write, people don’t like what I have to say, they can refuse to read my works. I’d never know it, and what I don’t know can’t bother me. My thoughts just flow and I can communicate whatever feelings or thoughts I want to.

The first time I was published I was in 10th grade. Nashville’s newspaper, the Tennessean, prints what is called a “3-star letter” in the Letters to the Editor section of its Op/Ed page. Each day, after reading through the Letters to the Editor received on a given day, the editor chooses one letter that he thinks is the best one and sets it off with 3 stars in the next day’s paper.  I had written a 3-star letter on issues pertaining to education, saying that if a teacher can control his or her classroom, and the students’ parents see to it that their kids are well-behaved, it improves the learning atmosphere for everyone involved. I was surprised to see it printed, especially as a 3-star letter, and even more surprised when I received an invitation in the mail to attend a banquet honoring all people who had written 3 star letters within the past year. It was held at the Maxwell House Hotel in May 2006. There were a few hundred people attending, and I was the second-youngest guest at 16 years old. The keynote speaker, former Tennessean editor Everett Mitchell, spoke to us about the importance of raising issues in our community that we felt passionate about, and encouraged us to continue writing. His speech made me realize that what I have to say matters and that I have important things to tell others.

This sentiment was re-affirmed my junior year of high school. It was a rough year for me and the other kids in my grade. A well-liked classmate of ours, Kevin Zoccola, had ended his life about 3 weeks into the school year for unknown reasons, and it was devastating. When news of his passing broke out, everyone was dumbstruck, myself included. I wanted to do or say anything to lift my friends up during this difficult time, but was at a loss. I ended up submitting a guest column to our school newspaper a few months later saying that we would make it through this tragedy. Many people, teachers and students alike, complimented me on it. I was glad that my words brought hope to those struggling to come to terms with what had happened. The following year, as a senior, I earned a spot on the newspaper staff and continued to get praise for my articles.

When it came time for me to go to college I was torn between majoring in English and journalism. I was a journalism major when I first came to Belmont so that I would have a career path laid out for me when I graduated. But I switched to English after despising my first news writing class. Having to learn the Associated Press standards for spelling, grammar, and punctuation made me feel as though I was being taught how to write all over again, and I didn’t want to learn new rules for telling others what was happening in the world around me.

In any case, no matter what field of study I pursued, I knew that I still wanted to write. Writing is how I make my contribution to the world, even if it is small. William Faulkner said in his Nobel Prize acceptance speech that “[Man] is immortal, not because he alone among creatures has an inexhaustible voice, but because he has a soul, a spirit capable of compassion and sacrifice and endurance. The poet’s, the writer’s, duty is to write about these things. It is his privilege to help man endure by lifting his heart, by reminding him of the courage and honor and hope and pride and compassion and pity and sacrifice which have been the glory of his past. The poet’s voice need not merely be the record of man, it can be one of the props, the pillars to help him endure and prevail.”

As an aspiring writer, it is my greatest wish to do likewise. I want my life to be more than “a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing,” as the Shakespearean character Macbeth stated so eloquently. I cannot count how many times I have been that idiot, saying anything just for the sake of talking, rather than risking being ostracized or questioned for saying nothing at all. I know I have more to offer than that. I write because I am convinced that the pen is indeed mightier than the sword; that any word originating in the inner recesses of the soul can cut through the white noise droning across the airwaves and touch the core of what it means to be human, in all its splendor and wretchedness; that it can seal the bonds of affection between friends, kinfolk, and lovers across nations, oceans, and the expanse of time. I write because I believe that the greatest weapon against despair is a single sentence uttered out of love. I write because the relativistic age we abide in makes it all too easy to throw words around, thus rendering them meaningless. I write because the heart aches to be consumed by beauty rather than the drivel issuing from the mouths of the Jersey Shore cast. And I write to share these thoughts with you: my audience. Upon meeting me you will notice that I am still usually reticent and reserved, but my pen speaks on my behalf; and because I can write, my silence is shattered.

Opposition to the HHS Mandate is not misogyny. I promise it’s not.

Over the past two years, President Obama’s health care reform law has been front and center in the news. People across the entire political spectrum have had differing opinions about it. But I think we can agree that the most controversial element of it has been the HHS Mandate, which would force all companies to pay for birth control, sterilizations, and abortion-inducing drugs as a part of their employees’ health insurance plans.

Some Christians are against the mandate because they are morally opposed to birth control, sterilizations, and abortion-inducing drugs. The Catholic Church’s position on this mandate has especially been front and center in this health care reform debate for that reason. It doesn’t want to be forced to pay for devices that it opposes for moral and religious reasons, and it supports other organizations who feel the same way. Some people have painted this opposition as misogyny or sexism. For example, Lisa Maatz, writing for the website Rh Reality Check, says this: This month, a for-profit arts-and-crafts chain and a for-profit custom cabinet manufacturer will go before the U.S. Supreme Court to argue against a woman’s right to use her insurance plan to access contraception. If you think you’ve entered a time warp, you are correct. If you also think this sounds like bosses trying to control the private lives of their employees, you’re right again. The leaders of Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood Specialties Corporation have invited themselves into their employees’ bedrooms and medicine cabinets under the guise of religious freedom, and these bosses are seriously out of line.” 

To clarify things, Church-run organizations are not deliberately trying to block women from using contraception. They allow their female employees to use contraception as long as they (these said companies) don’t have to pay for it. But that’s not the point I want to make here. Many non-Catholics, and perhaps some Catholics, would say that the Church’s opposition to birth control is misogynistic in and of itself. But it’s not at all. We Catholics may not be in favor of artificial birth control, but we do believe in something called Natural Family Planning. Natural Family Planning, or NFP, puts a man and a woman in touch with a woman’s fertility cycle, and the couple uses that information to decide how to plan their family. If you do the research, you’ll find that it’s pretty amazing. Let me explain.

Many people think NFP is the rhythm method (which is inaccurate), and thus they are opposed to it because they think it’s not effective. But couples have multiple options to choose from should they choose to pursue NFP. There are the Billings Model, the Creighton Model, the Marquette Model, and the STM method. These are all upwards of 95% effective at spacing out pregnancies.

But there are other positive side effects that come along with using fertility awareness methods besides the ability to avoid pregnancy. First of all, because artificial hormones are not being pumped into the woman’s body, it’s 100% medically safe. Secondly, it’s effective at helping couples conceive children, because the couple knows when the woman is fertile and when she isn’t. Third of all, it’s cheap. The couple doesn’t have to pay for pills, shots, or condoms or anything like that. NFP classes usually require registration fees, but aside from that it’s cost effective. Fourth, because of the lack of hormones, it’s also environmentally friendly. There’s no artificial estrogen leaking into our water supply.

Oh, did I mention that the divorce rate for NFP couples is DRAMATICALLY LOWER than the rate for those who use contraception? Because couples who use NFP have to talk about what’s happening with the woman’s body, they have to communicate openly with each other about what’s happening in their lives. NFP also promotes gender equality within marriages because the burden of spacing out pregnancies is placed on the man’s and woman’s shoulders, as opposed to the woman shouldering it by taking pills to suppress her fertility. Furthermore, because the man and woman aren’t pressured to be constantly sexually available for each other, they take each other for granted less, reach a new level of consideration for each other’s needs, and learn how to express love in non-sexual ways. How awesome is that?

Now, as a caveat, I would like to say that it’s true that NFP couples do tend to have bigger families than those who use artificial birth control. But let’s think about that for a second. NFP couples aren’t drugging themselves or wrapping themselves in plastic to suppress their fertility. They’re not trying to “protect themselves” from each other. They’re planning their families in a way that the man and and woman are actively involved in the process. They’re learning how to love each other without using each other. To sum it up, they seek to understand how their fertility works. And what happens when this is going on? They don’t see their fertility as a problem to be solved or avoided. So they’re more open to having more kids. And there’s nothing the matter with that at all.

There are other things I could say here to extol the virtues of NFP, but then this post would be way too long and I would lose your attention. But there are a few main points I want to leave with you. First, I hope everyone here has a better understanding of why Catholics feel the way they do about artificial contraception and why they feel the way they do about the HHS Mandate. It’s not condemning anyone, or saying “You belong in Hell if you use condoms and the Pill.” This is about being in favor of something that’s a solid alternative to artificial birth control. Secondly, I think all my readers here, regardless of what your religion or lack of it is, can agree that all I things I just said about NFP are good things. I don’t want to force Catholicism on anyone. I just want to explain the Church’s teachings in ways that anyone can understand. But above all, I really do wish more women (especially feminists!) knew that when it comes to family planning and relationships in general, there is something better for us to use than condoms and pills. We deserve better, as well as our spouses and families we have or may have some day.

To learn more about NFP, check out the links below. 🙂

http://iusenfp.com/home/

http://www.1flesh.org/

http://familyplanning.net/en

http://www.learn-nfp.org/nfpmyths.html

Pro-Life= Anti-Choice Extremism?

One ad-hominem attack in the abortion debate that pro-choice folk like to use against pro-life folk is that those who are pro-life are “anti-choice extremists.” The most recent example of this came this past January from New York governor Mario Cuomo who said in a radio interview that “Extreme conservatives have no place in the state of New York.” One of the groups included in that statement were people who are opposed to abortion. The governor has since withdrawn his remarks.

To be fair, there have been radicals like Eric Rudolph who think it’s acceptable to bomb abortion clinics and commit violence in the name of being “pro-life.” And people who do that make the rest of us pro-life folk look bad. But it bothers me to hear pro-life people being insulted like that, and it’s not only because I am against abortion and don’t want to be lumped into the same category as the Eric Rudolphs of this world.

I invite my readers to think about the term “anti-choice extremists” a little more deeply, and think about the implications of it. And then let’s consider what pro-lifers do to help out women facing unplanned pregnancies. When a woman becomes pregnant and is unable or unwilling to care for her child, she is not thrust into the two opposite extremes of being forced to raise her baby against her will or choosing to abort it. She has other options and she has places to turn to for support.

She can choose to place her child for adoption.  And if she chooses adoption, she can choose whether she wants to keep in touch with her child and her child’s adoptive family or not. The mother can also choose to place her child in a guardianship setting or kinship care setting, where someone in the mother’s family or someone else she knows well raises the child on her behalf. The mother can also turn to a maternity home (if there is one in her area), where she can receive help to either prepare to raise her child or place the baby for adoption. And she can also turn to a crisis pregnancy center, where she can learn about all the different life-giving options and resources that are available to her when she doesn’t know how to handle an unexpected pregnancy. These places across the nation assist with many different forms of free support for mothers, such as access to health insurance, pregnancy tests, ultrasounds, and STD testing; not to mention help finding housing, assistance to finish school, parenting classes, baby items, maternity clothing, and other things mothers and babies need.

Now let’s think about the people who work to give this help to mothers in need, and what they have in common: They are all pro-life. They give away so much of their time, monetary support, and material support to helping young women with unwanted pregnancies. They are all over the political spectrum, promoting personal and political efforts to help unwed mothers in their communities. They work tirelessly to lovingly let women know that abortion is not the only solution to their dilemma of an unwanted pregnancy. And they’re tagged as “anti-choice extremists.” That’s ironic if you ask me.

So, to conclude, I would like to discuss something I would love to see from the pro-choice crowd. It would be amazing to see them get behind efforts to build one adoption agency, one pregnancy resource center, and one maternity home for every abortion mill that’s established in their neighborhoods. Seriously. It would be wonderful. Because I have never heard of pro-choice people doing that in the name of choice. And because when the choice to abort is all about “a woman’s body and a woman’s decision,” and everyone else is supposed to back off completely and leave her alone, then there’s always the chance that the burden of an unwanted pregnancy becomes hers to carry alone. And no woman should ever be left to fend for herself during a time of great need in her life.

About Lent

I’ve never met a Christian who gets pumped up about the season of Lent. To those of you who enjoy this season, more power to you. To those of you who aren’t like that, don’t worry. I struggle with that as well. But I’ve had some thoughts recently that hopefully will help me, and I want to share them with you to help you out. This way, perhaps you and I both can get something out of Lent this year.

I think one big reason we don’t like Lent is because of the sacrifices and fasts we make during this time. None of us really want to give up something we enjoy or are attached to, or else we would fast more often as a spiritual discipline. We overindulge on the things we’re giving up on Fat Tuesday, because during the week we know we’ll be exposed to the things we sacrificed, and it’ll be tempting to cheat on our promises. So why not gorge yourself with chocolate on Mardi Gras until you’re almost sick? We can’t wait for Easter because then on that day until next Lent we don’t have to sacrifice anything if we don’t want to.

But let’s consider this from the viewpoint of one of the most basic tenets of our faith. God created us out of love and desires to enter into relationship with us. Indeed, He wants to be united with us eternally in heaven, if only we turn towards Him. Therefore, we are creatures in this world, but not of it. We are not meant to be entirely earthbound.

There are a few lines from C.S. Lewis’ book Mere Christianity that come to mind right now. Lewis asserts, “There are all sorts of things in this world that offer to give it to you, but they never quite keep their promise.” Furthermore, he states, “If I find in myself a desire which no experience in this world can satisfy, the most probable explanation is that I was made for another world.”

I cannot agree with these ideas enough. All the things we give up for Lent are not bad in and of themselves. They are quite nice when we have them. Your favorite song comes on the radio when you’re in the car. You buy something on sale at your favorite store. You come across something good on TV flipping through channels one night. We are a fortunate people, and we should be thankful for what we have.

Yet, at the same time, if we look to these things as the source of our happiness, we are mistaken. We are made for so much more than slavery to our possessions and addictions, than lusting after the various things that bring us pleasure, than our tastes and desires that keep us separated from God and others.

Only God and others can love us back. Soda and candy can’t. Alcohol and tobacco can’t. Your TV can’t. Video games can’t. Facebook can’t. Thus, our greatest freedom as Christians comes from loving God above all things, and letting that be reflected in our relationships with others.

The sluggish state of our economy should back up this point. Part of the reason we got into this mess is because when times were good people coasted on it and spent too much money on things they didn’t need. Now they’ve been cutting back on spending, partially to save money and partially because they’re realizing it’s not worth it to acquire things that won’t fulfill them in the long run.

While you and I hope to have a healthy economy up and running soon, we can learn something from this for our Lenten spiritual journey. We cannot know what it means to have a relationship with the Risen Christ until we have gone bankrupt from our preoccupations with this world, for we cannot truly celebrate Easter lest we understand and appreciate Lent as more than 6 weeks without chocolate and Facebook.