Shattered Silence

Benjamin Franklin wrote this about the virtue of silence: “Speak not but what may benefit yourself or others. Avoid trifling conversation.” This adage more or less sums up my personality, both for the better and for the worse. I have been a woman of few words for as long as I can remember, so much so that I was held back in pre-school because I never talked to my classmates or my teachers. According to my dad’s sister, who still lives in my hometown of Binghamton, New York, my earliest schoolteachers still remember me because I was so quiet and shy. I find it interesting that I’ve left a mark on people’s lives by doing nothing at all. Most remarkable people have at least left a few memorable quotations in their wake. I suppose I am a special case, because I cannot say the same about myself.

My taciturn ways have given me difficulties over the years. It has always been hard for me to build and maintain friendships. When I was a kid, I preferred to keep to myself, often reading rather than playing with my peers. As middle school and high school came and went, things didn’t change much. I wasn’t hated, but I wasn’t popular, either. Everyone else would trade inside jokes with their friends, would have their own special group of people that they hung out with, would almost constantly see each other outside of school, always chose each other for kickball teams and other games while I was the last one called, etc.

My friends through those years were anyone who would talk to me. I will never forget how I met one of my closest friends to this day, Maria Nicholson. It was my sophomore year of high school. I had a few classes with her best friend Jenny. Before the first bell rang each school morning, she and Jenny would sit along the edge of the hallway and chatter about who knows what to pass time. Both of them would often say hi to me as I walked by. I didn’t remember meeting Maria before, but politely said hello anyways. One morning when she greeted me I worked up the nerve to ask her where she knew me from. She chuckled and replied, “We don’t know each other. Jenny’s told me about you. My name’s Maria by the way.” I said “It’s nice to meet you Maria. I hope Jenny has been saying nice things about me.” She giggled again, assured me that she had heard good things about me, and we’ve been friends ever since.

Maria and other people who befriended me during those years couldn’t relate to how painful it was to freeze up during a social situation; to have more awkward silences than words spoken in a typical conversation with someone else, as if the other person had fired a tranquilizer dart directly at my vocal chords the moment they opened their mouth to talk to me; to want to get to know other people so badly, but to be too insecure and hesitant to initiate friendships. But Maria and others like her accepted me and reached out to me, and for that I will always be thankful. I don’t know how I would’ve made it through school without them.

I still have some regrets leftover from this period in my life. A few years ago, my freshman year of college, I went to my high school’s Homecoming football game. A lot of old classmates were home on their Fall Breaks. I ran into them during halftime. They were there palling around with their old buddies, just as they always had. They courteously said hello to me, asking me how I was doing, but I could sense the huge difference in the way they interacted with each other versus how they interacted with me. They were just comfortable with each other, almost as family members were. Upon seeing this it dawned on me that I had blown so many opportunities to just take an interest in other people’s lives, or make any small step towards overcoming my shyness.

Around middle school, my teachers pointed out to me that I had a knack for writing. My eighth grade teacher, Mr. Langley, was especially an inspiration to me. He had a love for literature and the arts, and could sense that same love in me. He said my writing ability was a gift to be cherished, polished, and used often. Up until I met him, I never knew how deep my love for the written word was. I had been a bookworm since I learned how to read, but this was a turning point for me. From then until now, writing was and still is my primary form of self-expression.

When I write, it is the only time I feel that I can be 100 percent myself. If, when I am writing, I cannot figure out how to share my thoughts, there are no social consequences for my failures. It is equally frustrating, but at least I know I will not be rejected or stared at like an insect for having writer’s block; whereas if I am with others and words escape me, I stand out like a sore thumb. When I write, I don’t have to worry about what others think of me. I don’t have to hold any thing back. If, when I write, people don’t like what I have to say, they can refuse to read my works. I’d never know it, and what I don’t know can’t bother me. My thoughts just flow and I can communicate whatever feelings or thoughts I want to.

The first time I was published I was in 10th grade. Nashville’s newspaper, the Tennessean, prints what is called a “3-star letter” in the Letters to the Editor section of its Op/Ed page. Each day, after reading through the Letters to the Editor received on a given day, the editor chooses one letter that he thinks is the best one and sets it off with 3 stars in the next day’s paper.  I had written a 3-star letter on issues pertaining to education, saying that if a teacher can control his or her classroom, and the students’ parents see to it that their kids are well-behaved, it improves the learning atmosphere for everyone involved. I was surprised to see it printed, especially as a 3-star letter, and even more surprised when I received an invitation in the mail to attend a banquet honoring all people who had written 3 star letters within the past year. It was held at the Maxwell House Hotel in May 2006. There were a few hundred people attending, and I was the second-youngest guest at 16 years old. The keynote speaker, former Tennessean editor Everett Mitchell, spoke to us about the importance of raising issues in our community that we felt passionate about, and encouraged us to continue writing. His speech made me realize that what I have to say matters and that I have important things to tell others.

This sentiment was re-affirmed my junior year of high school. It was a rough year for me and the other kids in my grade. A well-liked classmate of ours, Kevin Zoccola, had ended his life about 3 weeks into the school year for unknown reasons, and it was devastating. When news of his passing broke out, everyone was dumbstruck, myself included. I wanted to do or say anything to lift my friends up during this difficult time, but was at a loss. I ended up submitting a guest column to our school newspaper a few months later saying that we would make it through this tragedy. Many people, teachers and students alike, complimented me on it. I was glad that my words brought hope to those struggling to come to terms with what had happened. The following year, as a senior, I earned a spot on the newspaper staff and continued to get praise for my articles.

When it came time for me to go to college I was torn between majoring in English and journalism. I was a journalism major when I first came to Belmont so that I would have a career path laid out for me when I graduated. But I switched to English after despising my first news writing class. Having to learn the Associated Press standards for spelling, grammar, and punctuation made me feel as though I was being taught how to write all over again, and I didn’t want to learn new rules for telling others what was happening in the world around me.

In any case, no matter what field of study I pursued, I knew that I still wanted to write. Writing is how I make my contribution to the world, even if it is small. William Faulkner said in his Nobel Prize acceptance speech that “[Man] is immortal, not because he alone among creatures has an inexhaustible voice, but because he has a soul, a spirit capable of compassion and sacrifice and endurance. The poet’s, the writer’s, duty is to write about these things. It is his privilege to help man endure by lifting his heart, by reminding him of the courage and honor and hope and pride and compassion and pity and sacrifice which have been the glory of his past. The poet’s voice need not merely be the record of man, it can be one of the props, the pillars to help him endure and prevail.”

As an aspiring writer, it is my greatest wish to do likewise. I want my life to be more than “a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing,” as the Shakespearean character Macbeth stated so eloquently. I cannot count how many times I have been that idiot, saying anything just for the sake of talking, rather than risking being ostracized or questioned for saying nothing at all. I know I have more to offer than that. I write because I am convinced that the pen is indeed mightier than the sword; that any word originating in the inner recesses of the soul can cut through the white noise droning across the airwaves and touch the core of what it means to be human, in all its splendor and wretchedness; that it can seal the bonds of affection between friends, kinfolk, and lovers across nations, oceans, and the expanse of time. I write because I believe that the greatest weapon against despair is a single sentence uttered out of love. I write because the relativistic age we abide in makes it all too easy to throw words around, thus rendering them meaningless. I write because the heart aches to be consumed by beauty rather than the drivel issuing from the mouths of the Jersey Shore cast. And I write to share these thoughts with you: my audience. Upon meeting me you will notice that I am still usually reticent and reserved, but my pen speaks on my behalf; and because I can write, my silence is shattered.

Opposition to the HHS Mandate is not misogyny. I promise it’s not.

Over the past two years, President Obama’s health care reform law has been front and center in the news. People across the entire political spectrum have had differing opinions about it. But I think we can agree that the most controversial element of it has been the HHS Mandate, which would force all companies to pay for birth control, sterilizations, and abortion-inducing drugs as a part of their employees’ health insurance plans.

Some Christians are against the mandate because they are morally opposed to birth control, sterilizations, and abortion-inducing drugs. The Catholic Church’s position on this mandate has especially been front and center in this health care reform debate for that reason. It doesn’t want to be forced to pay for devices that it opposes for moral and religious reasons, and it supports other organizations who feel the same way. Some people have painted this opposition as misogyny or sexism. For example, Lisa Maatz, writing for the website Rh Reality Check, says this: This month, a for-profit arts-and-crafts chain and a for-profit custom cabinet manufacturer will go before the U.S. Supreme Court to argue against a woman’s right to use her insurance plan to access contraception. If you think you’ve entered a time warp, you are correct. If you also think this sounds like bosses trying to control the private lives of their employees, you’re right again. The leaders of Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood Specialties Corporation have invited themselves into their employees’ bedrooms and medicine cabinets under the guise of religious freedom, and these bosses are seriously out of line.” 

To clarify things, Church-run organizations are not deliberately trying to block women from using contraception. They allow their female employees to use contraception as long as they (these said companies) don’t have to pay for it. But that’s not the point I want to make here. Many non-Catholics, and perhaps some Catholics, would say that the Church’s opposition to birth control is misogynistic in and of itself. But it’s not at all. We Catholics may not be in favor of artificial birth control, but we do believe in something called Natural Family Planning. Natural Family Planning, or NFP, puts a man and a woman in touch with a woman’s fertility cycle, and the couple uses that information to decide how to plan their family. If you do the research, you’ll find that it’s pretty amazing. Let me explain.

Many people think NFP is the rhythm method (which is inaccurate), and thus they are opposed to it because they think it’s not effective. But couples have multiple options to choose from should they choose to pursue NFP. There are the Billings Model, the Creighton Model, the Marquette Model, and the STM method. These are all upwards of 95% effective at spacing out pregnancies.

But there are other positive side effects that come along with using fertility awareness methods besides the ability to avoid pregnancy. First of all, because artificial hormones are not being pumped into the woman’s body, it’s 100% medically safe. Secondly, it’s effective at helping couples conceive children, because the couple knows when the woman is fertile and when she isn’t. Third of all, it’s cheap. The couple doesn’t have to pay for pills, shots, or condoms or anything like that. NFP classes usually require registration fees, but aside from that it’s cost effective. Fourth, because of the lack of hormones, it’s also environmentally friendly. There’s no artificial estrogen leaking into our water supply.

Oh, did I mention that the divorce rate for NFP couples is DRAMATICALLY LOWER than the rate for those who use contraception? Because couples who use NFP have to talk about what’s happening with the woman’s body, they have to communicate openly with each other about what’s happening in their lives. NFP also promotes gender equality within marriages because the burden of spacing out pregnancies is placed on the man’s and woman’s shoulders, as opposed to the woman shouldering it by taking pills to suppress her fertility. Furthermore, because the man and woman aren’t pressured to be constantly sexually available for each other, they take each other for granted less, reach a new level of consideration for each other’s needs, and learn how to express love in non-sexual ways. How awesome is that?

Now, as a caveat, I would like to say that it’s true that NFP couples do tend to have bigger families than those who use artificial birth control. But let’s think about that for a second. NFP couples aren’t drugging themselves or wrapping themselves in plastic to suppress their fertility. They’re not trying to “protect themselves” from each other. They’re planning their families in a way that the man and and woman are actively involved in the process. They’re learning how to love each other without using each other. To sum it up, they seek to understand how their fertility works. And what happens when this is going on? They don’t see their fertility as a problem to be solved or avoided. So they’re more open to having more kids. And there’s nothing the matter with that at all.

There are other things I could say here to extol the virtues of NFP, but then this post would be way too long and I would lose your attention. But there are a few main points I want to leave with you. First, I hope everyone here has a better understanding of why Catholics feel the way they do about artificial contraception and why they feel the way they do about the HHS Mandate. It’s not condemning anyone, or saying “You belong in Hell if you use condoms and the Pill.” This is about being in favor of something that’s a solid alternative to artificial birth control. Secondly, I think all my readers here, regardless of what your religion or lack of it is, can agree that all I things I just said about NFP are good things. I don’t want to force Catholicism on anyone. I just want to explain the Church’s teachings in ways that anyone can understand. But above all, I really do wish more women (especially feminists!) knew that when it comes to family planning and relationships in general, there is something better for us to use than condoms and pills. We deserve better, as well as our spouses and families we have or may have some day.

To learn more about NFP, check out the links below. 🙂

http://iusenfp.com/home/

http://www.1flesh.org/

http://familyplanning.net/en

http://www.learn-nfp.org/nfpmyths.html

Pro-Life= Anti-Choice Extremism?

One ad-hominem attack in the abortion debate that pro-choice folk like to use against pro-life folk is that those who are pro-life are “anti-choice extremists.” The most recent example of this came this past January from New York governor Mario Cuomo who said in a radio interview that “Extreme conservatives have no place in the state of New York.” One of the groups included in that statement were people who are opposed to abortion. The governor has since withdrawn his remarks.

To be fair, there have been radicals like Eric Rudolph who think it’s acceptable to bomb abortion clinics and commit violence in the name of being “pro-life.” And people who do that make the rest of us pro-life folk look bad. But it bothers me to hear pro-life people being insulted like that, and it’s not only because I am against abortion and don’t want to be lumped into the same category as the Eric Rudolphs of this world.

I invite my readers to think about the term “anti-choice extremists” a little more deeply, and think about the implications of it. And then let’s consider what pro-lifers do to help out women facing unplanned pregnancies. When a woman becomes pregnant and is unable or unwilling to care for her child, she is not thrust into the two opposite extremes of being forced to raise her baby against her will or choosing to abort it. She has other options and she has places to turn to for support.

She can choose to place her child for adoption.  And if she chooses adoption, she can choose whether she wants to keep in touch with her child and her child’s adoptive family or not. The mother can also choose to place her child in a guardianship setting or kinship care setting, where someone in the mother’s family or someone else she knows well raises the child on her behalf. The mother can also turn to a maternity home (if there is one in her area), where she can receive help to either prepare to raise her child or place the baby for adoption. And she can also turn to a crisis pregnancy center, where she can learn about all the different life-giving options and resources that are available to her when she doesn’t know how to handle an unexpected pregnancy. These places across the nation assist with many different forms of free support for mothers, such as access to health insurance, pregnancy tests, ultrasounds, and STD testing; not to mention help finding housing, assistance to finish school, parenting classes, baby items, maternity clothing, and other things mothers and babies need.

Now let’s think about the people who work to give this help to mothers in need, and what they have in common: They are all pro-life. They give away so much of their time, monetary support, and material support to helping young women with unwanted pregnancies. They are all over the political spectrum, promoting personal and political efforts to help unwed mothers in their communities. They work tirelessly to lovingly let women know that abortion is not the only solution to their dilemma of an unwanted pregnancy. And they’re tagged as “anti-choice extremists.” That’s ironic if you ask me.

So, to conclude, I would like to discuss something I would love to see from the pro-choice crowd. It would be amazing to see them get behind efforts to build one adoption agency, one pregnancy resource center, and one maternity home for every abortion mill that’s established in their neighborhoods. Seriously. It would be wonderful. Because I have never heard of pro-choice people doing that in the name of choice. And because when the choice to abort is all about “a woman’s body and a woman’s decision,” and everyone else is supposed to back off completely and leave her alone, then there’s always the chance that the burden of an unwanted pregnancy becomes hers to carry alone. And no woman should ever be left to fend for herself during a time of great need in her life.

About Lent

I’ve never met a Christian who gets pumped up about the season of Lent. To those of you who enjoy this season, more power to you. To those of you who aren’t like that, don’t worry. I struggle with that as well. But I’ve had some thoughts recently that hopefully will help me, and I want to share them with you to help you out. This way, perhaps you and I both can get something out of Lent this year.

I think one big reason we don’t like Lent is because of the sacrifices and fasts we make during this time. None of us really want to give up something we enjoy or are attached to, or else we would fast more often as a spiritual discipline. We overindulge on the things we’re giving up on Fat Tuesday, because during the week we know we’ll be exposed to the things we sacrificed, and it’ll be tempting to cheat on our promises. So why not gorge yourself with chocolate on Mardi Gras until you’re almost sick? We can’t wait for Easter because then on that day until next Lent we don’t have to sacrifice anything if we don’t want to.

But let’s consider this from the viewpoint of one of the most basic tenets of our faith. God created us out of love and desires to enter into relationship with us. Indeed, He wants to be united with us eternally in heaven, if only we turn towards Him. Therefore, we are creatures in this world, but not of it. We are not meant to be entirely earthbound.

There are a few lines from C.S. Lewis’ book Mere Christianity that come to mind right now. Lewis asserts, “There are all sorts of things in this world that offer to give it to you, but they never quite keep their promise.” Furthermore, he states, “If I find in myself a desire which no experience in this world can satisfy, the most probable explanation is that I was made for another world.”

I cannot agree with these ideas enough. All the things we give up for Lent are not bad in and of themselves. They are quite nice when we have them. Your favorite song comes on the radio when you’re in the car. You buy something on sale at your favorite store. You come across something good on TV flipping through channels one night. We are a fortunate people, and we should be thankful for what we have.

Yet, at the same time, if we look to these things as the source of our happiness, we are mistaken. We are made for so much more than slavery to our possessions and addictions, than lusting after the various things that bring us pleasure, than our tastes and desires that keep us separated from God and others.

Only God and others can love us back. Soda and candy can’t. Alcohol and tobacco can’t. Your TV can’t. Video games can’t. Facebook can’t. Thus, our greatest freedom as Christians comes from loving God above all things, and letting that be reflected in our relationships with others.

The sluggish state of our economy should back up this point. Part of the reason we got into this mess is because when times were good people coasted on it and spent too much money on things they didn’t need. Now they’ve been cutting back on spending, partially to save money and partially because they’re realizing it’s not worth it to acquire things that won’t fulfill them in the long run.

While you and I hope to have a healthy economy up and running soon, we can learn something from this for our Lenten spiritual journey. We cannot know what it means to have a relationship with the Risen Christ until we have gone bankrupt from our preoccupations with this world, for we cannot truly celebrate Easter lest we understand and appreciate Lent as more than 6 weeks without chocolate and Facebook.